Carol Giles [Collins HS] INTERNET
EXPERIENCE
Carol
provided us with simulated internet research projects by dividing us up in
triads, giving each group several "information sheets" on a specific topic she had
obtained from surfing the net. She asked us to prepare an overhead transparency
that one of the group members would present to all of us. The following topics were
considered:
Christine Scott [Beethoven School] FIVE SENSES --
FLOATING AND SINKING
Christine
led us through a miniteach on the senses (focussed on vision)
using the optical illusion phenomenon that occurs when a drawing of two objects about
two inches apart are brought toward your eyes. FOLLOW-UP SUGGESTION: Try different separation distances (larger and smaller) and
also note if there are peripheral images in each case.
We then had fun with floating and sinking. Well, we didn't actually either float or sink, but observed various objects doing so:
Ed Scanlon [Morgan Park HS] KEPLER'S THIRD LAW
Ed then led us through an activity to illustrate KEPLER'S THIRD LAW, which
relates the orbital revolution time ("years") of the planets to their distances from the sun.
He passed out homemade devices consisting of a medium sized rubber stopper tied to
high-test fish line (100 pound), the line passed through a six inch length of glass
tubing (taped on the outside for safety and to provide a firmer grip) with a washer
on the other end to keep the line from sliding out of the tube. Ed then asked us
to work in groups, one person wrapping the "washer" end of the line around the rod,
holding firmly and swinging the stopper horizontally. we measured the revolution
time as a function of the radius of the circle, varied by adjusting the string which
was marked at 10 cm intervals. We all observed that the longer the string (larger
the orbit) the slower revolutions (longer year) in accordance with the behavior of
the planets in our solar system. We tried (not very successfully) to get the
quantitative relations predicted by Kepler's third law -- perhaps some refinements
to the experiment might produce better results.
Great, Ed - your usual creative approach!!
Notes taken by Ken Schug